Editorial and evidence standard

Pro-building. Unwilling to bend the record.

DataCenterData exists because debates about AI infrastructure routinely compare incompatible numbers. Our job is to preserve the distinctions that change the answer.

Version 0.1Published 10 September 2026

Evidence statuses

Announced

A public statement or plan

Useful as a baseline. Not an enforceable obligation and not an observed outcome.

Contractually committed

A duty in an agreement, order or other controlling record

We identify the legal entity, relevant phase, quantity and due date when public.

Not yet due

A real commitment whose deadline has not arrived

Never scored as failure.

Supported as delivered

Observed evidence materially matches the due commitment

The evidence and period remain visible.

Partially delivered

Some, but not all, of the due commitment is supported

Phased delivery and revised agreements are preserved.

Contradicted

Reliable evidence conflicts with the claim

We distinguish a conflicting record from an allegation.

Not verifiable

The reviewed record cannot support a conclusion

This does not mean zero, absent, false or noncompliant.

Source hierarchy

  1. Controlling agreements, regulatory orders, permits and audited government records.
  2. Government operating and financial records; EPA, DOE, Berkeley Lab and similar technical sources.
  3. Company disclosures, clearly labeled as company claims.
  4. Responsible secondary reporting used to locate or contextualize primary evidence, not replace it.

Rules that prevent false precision

Index and size rules

National aggregation rules

Document packets and watch points

A dossier’s source packet lists the controlling or evidentiary records reviewed and explicitly names missing agreements. Page or section locators identify the relevant provision when possible. A watch point may be a date, phase trigger, annual filing, docket event or replacement proposal; an unknown date remains unknown rather than becoming an invented deadline.

Corrections and commercial independence

We publish the source, source period, last-reviewed date and uncertainty with each finding. Better primary records should lead to a visible correction. Sponsorship, if ever accepted, cannot buy a verdict, select only favorable projects, delay a finding or suppress a correction. Editorial findings and commercial relationships remain separate and disclosed.

LicensingThe deep evidence ledger and public Indiana records are assembled from linked primary or first-party sources. Citizens Action Coalition’s public map informs the attributed discovery queue, but we found no machine-readable reuse license on review. Its complete row set and coordinates are therefore withheld from public redistribution pending permission or independent reconstruction. Source documents retain their own rights, and public accessibility is never treated as permission to scrape a proprietary database.