National coverage framework · last reviewed 10 September 2026

All 50 states are visible. Most are not counted—yet.

This is a research coverage map, not a claim that DataCenterData already knows every U.S. facility. Indiana has a statewide first pass. Ohio has separate major-project and physical-facility seed inventories plus a reviewed claim desk. Three other states have selected evidence. Blank statewide counts mean “not researched,” never zero.

50 states represented1 statewide first pass1 project + facility seed pass3 states with selected evidence45 state reviews not started
50states in the common framework
Indianastatewide first-pass dataset
Ohiomajor-project first pass + claim desk
Not yetnational facility totals—coverage is not comparable
A national denominator is not ready.Indiana and Ohio both separate large-project/campus records from physical-facility records because the inventories overlap. Ohio’s 29 operator-identified facility/building records are not yet a complete census. Adding incompatible rows would create a precise-looking but misleading U.S. total.
50states shown
Green: statewide first passCyan: project + facility seed passAmber: selected evidence onlyGray: research not started

Coverage parity

Same questions. Honest gaps.

Indiana and Ohio now share one target field standard. A check below means evidence exists for at least some records—not that statewide coverage is complete.

Evidence areaIndianaOhioRequired before comparable totals
Projects + facilities8 reviewed projects; 21 facility research records17 reviewed projects; 29 facility/building recordsReconcile the full candidate queue to campuses, buildings and provider presences.
Lifecycle + historyWithdrawn/expired records retained; former-name audit incompleteCurrent, preleasing and unresolved stages separated; acquisition/closure audit incompletePreserve proposals, renames, acquisitions, closures and withdrawals as dated events.
Power + scalePartialPartialKeep IT capacity, service request, grid draw and measured load separate.
Water + coolingSelected projects; facility coverage sparseSelected claims and permits; measured use sparseSeparate design, permit, withdrawal, consumption, discharge and source-water mix.
Jobs + fiscal outcomesSelected projects/dossiersSelected projects, statute and New Albany dossierReconcile promises with actual payroll, taxes, incentives claimed and public spending.
Claim checkingEmbedded in dossiers9-item state claim deskUse the same verdict vocabulary and dated evidence standard.

What “every” can honestly mean

We can target every evidence-identified facility, project and historical lifecycle record after a dated audit of operators, government records, dockets, permits, tax records, archives and directory leads. We cannot prove that an undisclosed private server room does not exist. Completeness is therefore a published audit boundary—not a marketing adjective.

Open data: U.S. coverage JSON · common state-data standard. Next priority states are Virginia, Texas, Georgia, Arizona and Washington; priority is a research queue, not a completeness claim.